JURY :
WEB SITE :
LIST OF WEB SITES:
1 = Null 2 = Deficient 3 = Average 4 = Good 5 = Excellent
Questionnaire :		Help	Note
A. FIRST IMPRESSION
As you arrive on the web site to be evaluated, have first a general overview of the options offered to you:
1.	Is the opening page providing the necessary information? Help: An opening page is the web equivalent of a book cover.
2.	How is the general appearance?
3.	How easy is it to read on screen? Help: Choice of a readable font (size, colours, contrast and harmony...)
4.	How is the quality of the texts?  Help: Spelling, syntax and grammar. How about the quality of the translation?
Comments:
B. STRUCTURE and FUNCTIONALITY of INFORMATION
Are the information and the proposed services coherently structured in order to ease the comprehension of the web site general organisation (ergonomics, usability, look, navigation easiness, and appropriate technologies)?
5.	Is information correctly organised on screen?
6.	Are organisation and presentation of information easing the access and appropriation (assimilation)?
7.	Are the differences between information sources, activities and services, easy to see?
8.	How well conceived is navigation within the web site?  Help: Is the web site's conception favouring research or is it easy to get lost? Is there navigational advises? Is a map of the web site available? Is there a glossary?
Comments:
C. OPTIMISATION of MULTIMEDIA RESOURCES
9.	How is the quality of the CAG?
10.	Is the definition of images satisfactory?
11.	Is the quality of audio sequences satisfactory?
12	Are illustrations, animations and audio sequences relevant and useful as information?
13.	How well are the various pages optimised for printing?
14.	Is there any pop up and, if yes, are they improving the use and comprehension of the web site?
15.	Is the speed rate of pages downloading acceptable?   Help: Is the size of files to download indicated? Is there a choice between several formats to download??
16.	the search engine within the web site relevant, easily understandable and easy to use?
Comments:
Is all the web site content accessible without specific applications? If specific applications are needed, is their a convenient link to find them? Is the web site recorded correctly on the main repertories and search engines?
D. CREDIBILITY
17.	Are the authors identities, including their titles and qualifications, clearly indicated?  Help: Are the name and references of the producing institution indicated? OR, Is the professional status of the author and the identity of the organism witch have produced the work clearly indicated? Is their an indication of the existence of an editorial committee with the mention of each member's titles, dignities and eventual role within the web site?
18.	How transparent are the financial information? How about the sponsors or the producers?  Help: Are they clearly separated from the content main subject pages? How discrete are the commercial messages?
19.	Identification des administrateurs du site avec leur(s) titre(s) et qualification(s) Sont- ils clairement donnés ?  Help: Is a credit page accessible on the web site or are the names of the responsible persons mentioned? Is it easy to communicate with the responsible organism or with the web master.
20.	Are information sources correctly and precisely indicated?  Help: Are they clear? Are the name of the author, creator, editor and their URL addresses written? Are the publication year of published texts, image or audio sequences indicated? Are the origins of the various documents indicated (Author, collection or any other source)?
21.	Is the "netiquette" enforced?  Help: Is the web site collecting personal data? Is there any information about protection of personal data? Is it possible to use one's right to correct on-line personal data? Is there any mention of the fact that the collected personal data are to be use used only for internal purpose, without any possibility to allow anyone else to use them? In case a public discussion virtual space is provided, is there any mention of the existence of a moderator? Is there any general indication to precise the rules, regulations or responsibilities?
Comments:
E. QUALITY of the CONTENTS
22.	Are the Contents exhaustive?  Help: Is the presented information factual and detailed enough? Is there an access to information selected or commented by experts?
23.	Are the treated subjects developed enough?  Help: Are each subject presented on the home page really treated?
24.	Are proposed hyperlinks of any relevance  Help: Are the proposed links corresponding to the web site contents? Are they directing to web sites which really are treating a relevant subject accordingly? Are they all directing to what is said? How about the web site visible link policy?
25.	Is the web site complete ?  Help: Or is it still under construction, even partially
26.	Is information actualised ?  Help: Is there any clear mention of the date of first redaction or publication of the published documents? Are the proposed links still active? Is their a possibility of visualising the new entrees? Is there a News rubric?
Comments:
Is there a fast response from the web site administration staff to your questions?
F. INTEREST and PEDAGOGICAL FORMULATION
Is their an on-line access to pedagogical resources or any educational data?
27.	Are proposed activities interesting, relevant and diverse?
28.	Could the web site be useful to a learning/teaching activity? Help: Could the web site be used to learn or to teach? Are the proposed activities adaptable and reusable?
29.	How about the quality of the vulgarisation?  Help: How about the proposed synthesis, explanations of acronyms, glossary, use of schemes? Are instructions clear enough?
30.	How about the pedagogical construction?  Help: Is their a real connection between the actual contents of the web sites and those which are supposed to be? Is the web site structure favouring a pedagogical use? Is the information organised in a logical enough way? Is it's presentation coherent and understandable? Is the information really relevant and useful to the target users whom the web site aims to?
Comments: